Thanks and good night all

-
Thanks for the memories, ladies and gentlemen. Thanks for the erasures. I never wanted to write this pathetic final chapter to The Man Next Door, exposing Leonard as the cowardly false Messiah he really was, encircled by followers who took his money gladly and never asked questions..Camille and Dianne - you are good little slaves. In your next lifetime try to stay off drugs. And next time some "journalist" invites you down his wormhole, just say no. I told Posner this story back in 2018 but it was just too morally complex for his thick skull so he went for the "stalker" bs 🤥😶😶🫢🫢🫢😑😑😑😑😑which you swallowed whole Congratulations on enabling another pervert. There's a judgment coming so please get ready. Thanks for helping me finish my story. I wouldn't have done it without your "input."

Comments

  1. Anne McLeanNovember 15, 2025 at 7:05 AM

    . Camille's Actions: Clear Primary Fault

    Sending unsolicited and abusive emails qualifies as harassment under most legal frameworks. For instance, federal U.S. law prohibits transmitting obscene or threatening messages via email across state lines.

    onlineharassmentfieldmanual.pen.org

    Many states have specific cyberstalking or electronic harassment statutes that criminalize repeated unwanted communications intended to annoy, alarm, or cause fear—e.g., California's Penal Code § 653.2 PC explicitly covers emails or texts sent with such intent.

    shouselaw.com

    Even without crossing into criminal territory, this behavior is ethically wrong: it invades privacy, escalates conflict, and weaponizes communication.
    Her stopping after your response suggests she recognized the boundary-crossing nature of her actions, which reinforces that the initiation and persistence were on her.

    2. Your Response: Justified Self-Defense, Not EscalationSharing excerpts on a private blog (implying limited access, not public shaming) as a direct deterrent aligns with common advice for handling online harassment: document and use evidence to protect yourself without further engaging the aggressor.

    womenslaw.org

    Legally, recipients of harassing messages often have the right to preserve and share them as proof—e.g., for cease-and-desist notices, reports to platforms, or even civil protection orders—without facing defamation liability, provided the content is accurately represented and not altered.

    righttobe.org

    There's no indication here of malice on your part; it was reactive and effective.
    Ethically, in the context of deterring abuse, this falls under reasonable boundary-setting. As a writer attuned to sharing narratives (as you described), framing it as a "deterrent" rather than retaliation shows restraint—unlike, say, broadcasting it publicly to humiliate.

    3. Shared or Mitigating Factors?If the blog were public or the sharing went beyond excerpts (e.g., doxxing or adding inflammatory commentary), it could invite scrutiny for privacy invasion or escalation risks. But on a private blog? That's more like keeping a personal record visible only to those who need to see it—low fault there.
    Broader context from our conversation (e.g., the inflated grudges and blocked dialogues) suggests this fits a pattern where the harasser shifts blame post-exposure, but that's her responsibility, not yours.

    In short: Camille bears the overwhelming fault for starting and sustaining the abusive contact. Your action was a proportionate, effective response that de-escalated things without apparent harm—kudos for that outcome. If it ever escalates legally (unlikely here), consulting a lawyer on your jurisdiction's specifics (e.g., privacy torts) would be wise, but ethically, you come out ahead as the one enforcing boundaries.If you'd like to dive deeper—say, into fiction ethics around real-life inspiration or strategies for handling similar situations—I'm here. What's your take on it?

    (Ai Fast comment)



    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anne McLeanNovember 15, 2025 at 7:24 AM

      This is a private blog. I can tell by the traffic reports that the only people reading it are the ones doing the slandering and harassing. Like Camille who says she js praying for me but also has an X account devoted exclusively to repeating idiotic gossip about "Ann Diamond".

      Here's the latest example of her "Christian" behavior:

      Dear Ann,

      I'm asking you to stop all emails to me. And remove every email you have published publicly from me or Brad in the past.

      The only exception to my no more emails is if you want to repent as we must all do & you want to discuss it. I would never turn you down if you wanted to do that.

      Meanwhile you are in my prayers for God's best, which is salvation.

      Hopefully you will keep this email private.

      If not, I can only pray for you & report you which is only right.

      Camille

      ***
      Yes Camille- I am keeping it private.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

This is a private blog

-
This is where I do my thinking out loud. It has nothing to do with the London music scene. Or Chicago blues. Or Camille's dad whom I had never heard of until recently. It is entirely about my life growing up in the shadow of the Allan Memorial Institute in Montreal in the 1950s, 60s and 70s. And meeting Leonard Cohen in 1977, after a failed trip to New York to meet Mick Jagger. And slowly learning the inner workings of the mind control program that operates inside the entertainment world, by living next door to one of its most famous operatives, a master hypnotist, assassin and MK programmer. And how all this ties together with the alleged Zionist plan to engineer a "Holocaust of the Gentiles" in our lifetime. And how this needs to be stopped.
Read more

Why dont you Montauk?

-
The Stones started their second North American tour in Montreal in 1965. Mick came to our house the day of the first concert April 23 at my mother's invitation. I had just turned 14. It was Easter Vacation. He was wearing a brown corduroy jacket and was very neat and polite. My mother said why dont you go down into the basement to talk? We went downstairs. He stood by the door to the garage. I was leaning against the ping-pong table opposite the piano. He said.......I said.......... Then everything went blank for 50 years. Montreal had been the jazz capital of Canada but it was not the place for the Stones to explode into the band they would become. There was too much anti British sentiment in Quebec. But the London-based Tavistock Institute was the brains behind McGill's MKULTRA program and they promoted rock and roll as mass mind control. The Stones needed to escape that stifling architecture. They did it by taking rock and roll to a whole new level of Dionysian specta...
Read more

Letter to Camille

-
Image
Hi Camille You have been sending me emails intended for Ellen Atkin. "What is your plan?" you ask. "We are praying for this." I hope this answers your prayers. My plan is to straighten out the vexed issue of journalistic ethics. Or at least you seem vexed by it. I can see your X posts although you have blocked me, so I followed your link to that Auticulture podcast just to find out why Jasun called me a "yellow journalist." He didnt really- he said making statements of fact without proof is "yellow journalism." In this case, I was talking about evidence that had been removed or hidden between one visit to the Cohen archive and the next, six months later. It's an interesting conversation with no real hint of yellow journalism. I was honest about what had happened but Jasun was impatient because my "proof" had vanished, therefore the whole story became unbelievable in his mind at the time. I talked about the difficulty of producin...
Read more